Copyright © 2012 Sony Digital Camera Review.
- 10.1-megapixel Super HAD CCD image sensor
- 4x optical zoom; SteadyShot digital image stabilization
- 2.7-inch LCD screen
- Face Detection; in-camera retouching tools
- 12MB built-in memory; capture images to Memory Stick Duo/PRO Duo Media (not included)
Product Description
The Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950 brings you a variety of intelligent features in a compact, easy-to-use design. Face Detection technology automatically detects up to eight faces and optimizes focus and exposure settings, while a 4x optical zoom lens and 10.1 megapixel resolution deliver crisp, clear images…. More >>
June 27, 2010 at 13:22
My rating doesn’t reflect the fact that the flash bulb in mine was doa, because that could just as easily happen to any camera… It’s just a little annoying that their QC department didn’t catch it. Anyways, Amazon is sending me a new one, and letting me use this one until the new one gets here.
The quality is great overall. Using ISO100 mode with a quick shutter speed produces an awesome quality outdoor scenery shot. For indoors, I found that using the automatic shutter settings worked best, and indeed worked well. I took a photo of a $5 bill (fitting the whole bill in the frame), and was able to clearly read the little “united states of america” written in the border around Lincoln’s portrait. In fact, I could even see the ink bleed on each of the little letters. For outdoor shots, the 4x zoom doesn’t seem to cost the photos any quality, and could even show some details better than i could see them with my own eyes, and I have perfect vision.
With that said, there are a couple points which i don’t like about the camera. First, the quality of photos drops dramatically when you use an ISO setting much higher than 100. Don’t even bother with the ISO3200, it looks substantially worse than a cell phone camera. I also don’t like that it’s one of sony’s only cameras that doesn’t have a Carl-Zeiss lens. I was so used to Sony cameras using one, that I was surprised to find out that mine doesn’t. The Sony lens that it uses seems to work very well though, it may not even be noticeably different. I also don’t like that you have to remove the battery to charge it. You can buy an additional charger that plugs directly into the camera, but why wouldn’t they just give you one in the first place? If i wanted to pay another $20 for that, then i would’ve just paid an extra $20 towards a more expensive camera to begin with.
Overall I really like this camera, and would recommend it to anyone looking for a very cheap, but decent quality camera. I am using mine with an 8GB Sandisk Memory Stock Pro Duo, which holds 1900 photos at full resolution, or 5.5 hours of video.
————–
Update: Amazon was out of this camera, so they refunded my money, and I got a Sony DSC-W290 instead, which I am much happier with overall. It’s double the price though, so I guess you get what you pay for. I don’t think the S950 is the level of quality where you could expect to be happy with the camera for years to come; it’s more of an introductory camera that you’d probably plan on replacing a year later. I would change my rating to 3 stars if amazon let me.
Rating: 4 / 5
June 27, 2010 at 13:51
I unfortunately agree with the other reviews. My friends had this brand so I purchased this camera as a preorder. It suffers from the following problems:
1) Excessive noise in low light (grainy pics)
2) No video zoom
3) Slow response time. It does not take pics quickly and recover well.
4) Poor focus.
5) In playback, it takes a second for each and every pic to focus from initial graininess.
I wish I could still return this item but alas, 30 days have passed and I threw out the box!
Rating: 2 / 5
June 27, 2010 at 16:37
I am one of those typical Sony loyalist but I am very disappointed by this camera. The noise on most photos was terrible especially in lower light. Close up photos in bright sunshine was fine but I could not get a decent photo (with Flash). Surprisingly, I had an issue with the Flash too since its coverage was very less and did not light up the subject(s) well or even uniformly.
It’s a great price but poor quality. I am returning this product for another camera.
Rating: 1 / 5
June 27, 2010 at 19:17
so many people on here blast things for being cheap–guess what? If you buy the $150 Sony camera instead of the $350 one expect it to be $200 less effective. It is a fabulous camera for the money–I have had numerous photos published with it–and its predecessor–you have to accept limitations–it isn’t made for night/low light or for long range work–other than that, it WILL be fine for you if you just like to have a camera handy, but don’t want to spend more money. If you DO want more, go up the price line and you will find what you are looking for.
Rating: 5 / 5
June 27, 2010 at 22:13
I’ve been using my camera for a few weeks and I’m very pleased with its performance.
The pictures are clean, the colours are vivid, and it’s very easy to use.
I have taken pictures in the dark and can see all the details of the items or persons in the shot.
Uploading and sending pictures or videos are a breeze.
Great camera.
Rating: 4 / 5
June 30, 2010 at 08:13
Buy:Cialis Soft Tabs.Propecia.Super Active ED Pack.Maxaman.Zithromax.Cialis Super Active+.Viagra Super Force.Viagra Soft Tabs.Viagra Super Active+.Soma.Cialis.Levitra.Cialis Professional.Viagra Professional.Tramadol.VPXL.Viagra….